Search 
     
 
 Most Popular Searches:  Thomas Paine | Thomas Jefferson | Music | Great Depression | Edison  
 
Invention & Technology MagazineWinter 2006    Volume 21, Issue 3
Browse Archives

Browse our Invention & Technology Magazine issues from 1985 to the present.

Archives >>

 
 
 
 
 
Notes from the Field


Grasping at Straws

Who among us has not looked at one and thought, “I could make this better”?
by Frederic D. Schwarz

From left: A device to avoid sharing a cup; two ways to make a drinker look silly; and a pop-up straw for beverage containers.
From left: A device to avoid sharing a cup; two ways to make a drinker look silly; and a pop-up straw for beverage containers.
(U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE)

Elsewhere in this issue can be found a “Postfix” about the flexible drinking straw and its inventor, Joseph B. Friedman. In the course of researching that article, we went through more than a century of American straw patents. In so doing, we found that certain irresistible themes have occurred over and over to straw inventors through the ages.

One persistent dream of straw inventors is a beverage container with a straw already inside it. Open the can and a straw pops up, ready for you to drink from. Who could resist that? The problem is that when the container is closed, the straw has to be shorter than the container, but afterward, it has to be taller. So inventors have come up with a striking profusion of spring-loaded devices, expandable straws, telescoping straws, straws that lie coiled like a snake, and many other ingenious solutions.

The only trouble with all these inventions is that nobody needs them, since it takes about two seconds to stick a straw into the container yourself. Nonetheless, the world is full of inventors who believe that if only they can find the perfect straw-in-container solution, our nation will reclaim the thousands of hours of productivity that are currently wasted every year in unwrapping straws and inserting them into soda cans by hand.

Other pointless but repeatedly attempted inventions include straws that let multiple people drink from one container; straws that let one person drink from multiple containers; straws combined with stirring implements; straws combined with toothbrushes; straws that make music; lighted straws; and straws that add a flavoring agent. The inventor of each one of these no doubt saw himself or herself as another Joseph Friedman, bringing the world an indispensable device that it never knew it needed.

Alongside all these clever solutions to nonexistent problems are repeated and dauntless attempts to solve an impossible problem: getting kids to drink their milk. Or as a 1933 patent by Sonia Tycko, of Los Angeles, puts it, “To interest the child to the extent that it will voluntarily sip the entire contents of the vessel, this being of particular benefit to mothers who are continuously confronted with the feeding problem of their offspring, and compelled by stratagem and force to get them to take or consume the proper quantity of nourishment, such as milk, fruit juices, water, etc., required.”

That patent involved a floating duck, which was supposed to enchant a young child. Through the decades all sorts of novelty features have been tried—animals, spirals, pinwheels, noisemakers, smiling-face disks (no prizes for guessing which decade that one was invented in)—all with the goal of solving an eternal human problem that remains as real today as it was in 1936, when Arthur P. Gildersleeve, of Denver, Colorado, explained the need for his twistable straw as follows: “It frequently happens that children, whether well or sick, refuse obstinately to drink certain liquids, such as fruit juices, milk and the like, which are necessary in a balanced diet.”

In 1951 Alfred G. Butsch, of Erie, Pennsylvania, justified his zigzag straw thus: “Most children at one time or another refuse to drink certain liquids essential to their health. The reason behind such refusal may be a mere whim or the suggestion from another child’s refusal to drink. . . .” In 1980, when Joe H. Nickell, of West Liberty, Kentucky, patented a “magic drinking straw” in which milk makes a picture appear, he wrote: “An object of my present invention is to encourage children to drink milk.” Nathan Cohen, of Queens, New York, said in 1986 that his loop-the-loop straw would provide “an incentive for children, invalids, and others to consume liquids.” That same year Don S. Karterman, of Anchorage, Alaska, called his spinning-disk attachment “a means for encouraging children to drink nourishing fluids.” And in 1988 Tom Pinney, of Kansas City, Kansas, predicted that his animal figure would “present an ornamental, unique appearance to the drinking straw in order to encourage children to drink liquids, e.g., milk, from a drinking glass.”

Not that gimmicks like this have ever worked, if the children our staff is familiar with are any indication. “Stratagem and force” are much more effective, especially the latter. So in his 1991 patent, Kenneth Gandy of Indianapolis abandoned the kiddie angle and appealed instead to historical anthropology to justify his novelty straw. Gandy’s invention is a device that “to the surprise and perhaps dismay of an unwary supposed drinker, instead of affording a comforting sip, directs pressurized liquid to squirt the supposed drinker in the face or otherwise.” What need does this invention fill?

He explains: “We humans have been caught up with playing practical jokes on one another for centuries. For example, whether it be tying one another’s shoelaces together or the use of the old standby squirting flower, practical jokes have provided useful entertainment for some time. Despite the existence of these and other prior novelty devices and practical jokes, there exists an ever constant demand and need for improved and varying practical jokes to sate the sense of we human beings, especially in a world which some would say grows more technical and complicated, and less humorous, by the day.” That’s a tall order for a squirting straw to fill, but just as Friedman’s invention made life a little better for millions of people each day, we suppose it’s possible that a practical joke with a properly chosen victim can, in its own way, make a small but significant contribution to world peace and harmony.

 
Cold War Survivor
A Georgia fallout shelter is saved for posterity

In a recent issue, one of our authors recalled the atom-bomb drills that his grade school held. Your columnist is barely old enough to have experienced a few of these in the late 1960s. By that time even young children had some inkling of how terribly destructive atomic bombs were, and every time we had a drill, someone was sure to express skepticism about whether kneeling with our heads against the wall would be of any use against a nuclear attack. The teacher would then explain that since the bombs were likely to be targeted at New York City, some 60 miles away, there was a good chance that we would have only fallout to contend with. In the third grade, we were still naive enough to think, “Oh, good.”

A-bomb drills survive only in memory, to be indulgently chuckled at someday by our children (if we’re lucky), but more tangible artifacts of the Cold War are still around. In Gainesville, Georgia, a 1961 fallout shelter has recently been dug up and removed to safety.

The shelter was a mass-produced model made mostly of sheet steel. When buried under three feet of earth, supposedly enough to block 99.9 percent of gamma rays, it was visible as a shallow mound with two protruding air vents and a hatch for entry and exit. On the inside it was 12 feet by 8 feet. The shelter had hookups for electricity and water and a pipe leading to the exterior for waste disposal, as well as bunks and storage shelves. It cost $1,500 to build.

After decades of disuse, the shelter became endangered when the property it sat under was acquired for a sewage-pump station. Although the man who had built it, Walter Ladd, told the Gainesville Times, “Ah, it ain’t much,” history lovers pleaded with the city not to demolish it. In 2003 a team of historians measured and photographed the shelter and drew up a set of plans, and the next year it was removed to a local preservationist’s property. So far, worries that it would collapse have proved unfounded. The Hall County Historical Society hopes one day to put it on display to show how real and visceral fear of a nuclear attack was in the early 1960s.


 
 
Discuss this article  |  Print this article  |  Email this article
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Contact Us  |  Subscriber Services  |  Terms and Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Advertising  |  Forbes.com  
 

American History from AmericanHeritage.com. Copyright 2008 American Heritage Publishing. All rights reserved.